JEAB Tables of Contents

JEAB: May 2001

Table of Contents for MAY 2001 (Volume 75)

Clicking on will link to the complete article.
Clicking on author names will link to the abstract.
In order to view PDF files, please download the latest FREE Adobe Reader.

(328K) Richard L. Shull, Scott T. Gaynor, and Julie A. Grimes. Response rate viewed as engagement bouts: Effects of relative reinforcement and schedule type. Pp. 247-274.

(424K) Barbara J. Kaminski and Nancy A. Ator. Behavioral and pharmacological variables affecting risky choice in rats. Pp. 275-297.

(168K) Terry W. Belke and Julie Belliveau. The generalized matching law describes choice on concurrent variable-interval schedules of wheel-running reinforcement. Pp. 299-310.

Theoretical Article

(436K) James A. Dinsmoor. Stimuli inevitably generated by behavior that avoids electric shock are inherently reinforcing. Pp. 311-333.

Commentaries

(104K) Murray Sidman. Safe periods both explain and need explaining. Pp. 335-338.

(with Baum) William M. Baum. Molar versus molecular as a paradigm clash. Pp. 338-341.

(88K) Philip N. Hineline. Beyond the molar-molecular distinction: We need multiscaled analyses. Pp. 342-347.

(68K) Philip J. Bersh. The molarity of molecular theory and the molecularity of molar theory. Pp. 348-350.

(112K) Marc N. Branch. Are responses in avoidance procedures “safety” signals? Pp. 351-354.

(with Branch) Jack Michael and John W. Clark. A few minor suggestions. Pp. 354-357.

(with Branch) Alan Baron and Michael Perone. Explaining avoidance: Two factors are still better than one. Pp. 357-361.

(80K) Ben A. Williams. Two-factor theory has strong empirical evidence of validity. Pp. 362-365.

Reply

(128K) James A. Dinsmoor. Still no evidence for temporally extended shock-frequency reduction as a reinforcer. Pp. 367-378.

Complete Archive of Selected Articles