The good productivity game: Increasing work performance in a rehabilitation setting.

Lutzker, J. R., & White-Blackburn, G. (1979). The good productivity game: Increasing work performance in a rehabilitation setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 488.

Simple reinforcement systems have been used to improve performance in a broad range of settings. For example, in classrooms, the Good Behavior Game bas been shown to be very effective (Barrish, Saunders, and Wolf, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1969, 2, 119-124). In industry, small bonuses were used to increase the punctuality of workers (Hermann, deMontes, Dominquez, Montes, and Hopkins, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1973, 6, 503-572). In a sheltered workshop setting, Shroeder (Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1972, 5, 45-52) examined work rates under varying frequencies and amounts of reinforcement and response force. The present study involved the utilization of simple group contingencies to increased productivity in a rehabilitation industry. Four state hospital residents who were trainees at a rehabilitation industry participated in the study which examined the effects of feedback, and feedback plus the Good Productivity Game to improve work output. The task, for which the employee's were paid a wage, involved sorting boards by size. When the employees were provided with feedback on the number of boards sorted during the observation period, productivity increased slightly over baseline. After a return to baseline, the Good Productivity Game was played. For performance, the game afforded the employees pseudo-competition (in that teams were paired against each other, but both teams always won) and simple rewards such as candy and early work termination. The game improved performance by 104% over the second baseline and by 64% over the third baseline. Data gathered on rates of on-task behavior by the employees correlate with the productivity rates. Data gathered on rates of staff attention paid to employees show little difference across conditions, thus corroborating the function of the Good Productivity Game in increasing work output. Although no formal data were collected, the staff continued to use the game with considerable success after the formal termination of the study. The Good Productivity Game appears useful in increasing work output in a rehabilitation setting. Further research should concentrate on the utility of the game throughout longer periods of the workday and over extended periods of time.