Wayne W. Fisher, Iser G. DeLeon, Vanessa Rodriguez-Catter, & Kris M. Keeney (2004).
Enhancing the effects of extinction on attention-maintained behavior through noncontingent delivery of attention or stimuli identified via a competing stimulus assessment.
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,
37, 171-184.
Recent research has shown that the noncontingent delivery of competing
stimuli can effectively reduce rates of destructive behavior maintained
by social-positive reinforcement, even when the contingency for destructive
behavior remains intact. It may be useful, therefore, to have a systematic
means for predicting which reinforcers do and do not compete successfully
with the reinforcer that is maintaining destructive behavior. In the present
study, we conducted a brief competing stimulus assessment in which
noncontingent access to a variety of tangible stimuli (one toy per trial)
was superimposed on a fixed-ratio 1 schedule of attention for destructive
behavior for individuals whose behavior was found to be reinforced by
attention during a functional analysis. Tangible stimuli that resulted in
the lowest rates of destructive behavior and highest percentages of engagement
during the competing stimulus assessment were subsequently used in a
noncontingent tangible items plus extinction treatment package and were
compared to noncontingent attention plus extinction and extinction alone.
Results indicated that both treatments resulted in greater reductions in the
target behavior than did extinction alone and suggested that the competing
stimulus assessment may be helpful in predicting stimuli that can enhance
the effects of extinction when noncontingent attention is unavailable.
DESCRIPTORS: attention-maintained problem behavior, competing stimuli, extinction, functional analysis, noncontingent reinforcement